Banishing ‘Zuckerbucks’ from Wisconsin Elections: A Constitutional Victory


Byline: La News Center Staff


Wisconsin voters have overwhelmingly approved constitutional amendments that prohibit private funds from influencing election administration in the key battleground state. The successful measures, known as “anti-Zuckerbucks” amendments, aim to bolster election integrity by limiting the role of wealthy benefactors in the electoral process.

Ban on Private Grants

The amendments, passed with a majority vote, prevent local election officials from accepting or receiving private grant money to conduct elections. This restriction applies to any organization, individual, or group that does not hold an official election office within the state.

Exclusive Election Administration

Additionally, the measures require that all aspects of election administration, including ballot handling, counting, and oversight, be conducted exclusively by designated election officials. This provision aims to ensure that elections are run fairly and impartially, free from partisan or financial biases.

The “Zuckerbucks” Controversy

The term “Zuckerbucks” arose in 2020 when Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, donated 0 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), a liberal group that provides funding to local election officials. Critics argued that the donation, intended to support election-related infrastructure and equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic, disproportionately benefited Democratic strongholds and created an imbalance in electoral spending.

Republican Support

The “anti-Zuckerbucks” amendments have been championed by Republican lawmakers, who argue that private funding in elections undermines the integrity of the democratic process. They believe that wealthy individuals or organizations should not be allowed to influence election outcomes through financial contributions.

Democratic Concerns

Democrats, however, have expressed concerns that the amendments could restrict access to essential election resources and make it more difficult to conduct elections efficiently. They also worry that the provision regarding election worker qualifications could be interpreted to limit the ability of certain groups to participate in the electoral process.

Nationwide Trend

Wisconsin is the 28th state to place restrictions on the use of private funds in elections. Other battleground states, such as Georgia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Arizona, have also enacted similar measures in recent years.

Impact on Future Elections

With the passage of these amendments, Wisconsin will move forward with elections that are more tightly regulated and less susceptible to external influence. The amendments are expected to have a significant impact on the upcoming 2024 presidential election, as Wisconsin is a key swing state that could determine the outcome of the race.


The passage of the “anti-Zuckerbucks” amendments in Wisconsin represents a significant shift in election regulations, aiming to enhance the fairness and integrity of the electoral process. While the amendments have both supporters and detractors, they reflect a growing concern about the potential for private funding to distort election outcomes and undermine public trust in the democratic system.

Data sourced from: